The documentary record · October 29, 2026
Sources & bibliography
Find the record.
Follow it into the study.
Search by case, document group or keyword. Each reference keeps its original source label and leads back to the passages where it is cited.
Document groups describe the record’s form, not its reliability. Testimony, allegations and court findings retain their separate roles. Multiple presentations of the same record are not independent corroboration.
33 records
Coingate
State v. Noe, 2009-Ohio-6978
Ohio Sixth District Court of Appeals · 2009-12-31
Where to look. L-06-1393 / L-09-1193; ¶¶24–41 (theft and scope of consent), ¶¶43–58 (forgery), ¶13 (verdicts), opening and disposition
Cited in this study
12 more locations
- The two funds: capital, discretion and compensation
- When an inventory inspection could be staged
- Why managerial discretion did not authorize the withdrawals
- Criminal judgments and their scope
- Liquidation, restitution and life after prison
- Public investment, theft and recovery
- Chronology
- People and institutions
- Reading the documentary record
- Assessment
- Study overview
- Financial effects & models
BWC Capital Coin Funds I and II — special audit
Ohio Auditor of State · 2006-02-22
Where to look. Special audit printed pp. 8, 10–16; Attachment A pp. 4–13 (structure and first-day tracing), pp. 14–27 (subsequent uses), p. 45 (Spectrum cash flows); Attachment B pp. 4–9 (collection protocol, Spectrum and valuation); Attachment C pp. 2–8 (controls); Attachment C printed pp. 18–21 (portfolio-level reporting, materiality-based oversight and consultant coverage); PDF pp. 304–307 including covers.
Cited in this study
16 more locations
- Why workers’ compensation money entered the coin market
- The two funds: capital, discretion and compensation
- Following the cash: the first day of Fund I
- Fund II: new capital, earlier obligations and repeated transfers
- Profit allocations were not the same as cash distributions
- How the controls failed
- Recovering the physical assets: custody, count and value
- Spectrum: trading, custody and the liquidation settlement
- What the Spectrum cash-flow figures measure
- Chronology
- People and institutions
- Reading the documentary record
- Assessment
- Study overview
- Research and analysis
- Financial effects & models
Amended report of investigation — BWC
Ohio Inspector General · 2014-04-24; amended copy
Where to look. File 2005-091, amended; printed pp. 7–10 (investment authority, selection and internal-audit response), pp. 12–15 (traced misappropriation), pp. 21–23 (Gasper), pp. 90–93 (reforms, liquidation and restitution credit); official hosted PDF adds cover pages; printed p. 10 (PDF p. 15), internal warning, response and second allocation
Cited in this study
- The warning that did not stop the next investment
- Why workers’ compensation money entered the coin market
10 more locations
- Warnings before the second investment
- Public officials: proven misconduct and the limits of association
- What changed in investment governance
- Liquidation, restitution and life after prison
- Public investment, theft and recovery
- Chronology
- People and institutions
- Reading the documentary record
- Policy response
- Financial effects & models
Tom Noe sentenced for illegal campaign contributions
U.S. Department of Justice · 2006-09-12
Cited in this study
2 more locations
Tom Noe pleads guilty to campaign-finance charges
U.S. Department of Justice · 2006-05-31
Cited in this study
Noe campaign-contribution indictment
U.S. Department of Justice · 2005-10-27
Cited in this study
State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Ohio BWC
Supreme Court of Ohio · 2005-07-13
Where to look. 106 Ohio St.3d 113; 2005-Ohio-3549; ¶¶18–25 (majority), ¶¶30–34 (dissent)
Noe still owes taxpayers $11.6 million
The Blade · 2022-07-22
Cited in this study
1 more locations
Spectrum Fund accounting restatement
Spectrum Group International — SEC Form 8-K · 2009-06-30
Where to look. Note 3, Other Restatements; Transactions with a Controlled Entity; F-19
Cited in this study
2 more locations
Escala and Spectrum announce Ohio asset-purchase agreement
Escala Group — PRNewswire, retained by Europa Press · 2006-02-28
Where to look. Opening three paragraphs
Cited in this study
2 more locations
Coins acquired by Noe to be auctioned
The Blade — reproduced by CoinCollector · March 2006 context; reproduction undated
Where to look. Brandt’s description of settlement; dealer objections; auction terms
Spectrum wins Ohio coin sale
The E-Sylum, citing The Blade’s March 31 report · 2006-04-02
Where to look. Volume 9, Number 14, Article 13
Cited in this study
2 more locations
Thomas W. Noe — offender and supervision record
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction · Accessed 2026-10-26
Where to look. Status; Sentence Information; Supervision Start Date and Period of Supervision. Historical parole-review fields are not a current clemency determination.
Cited in this study
2 more locations
Ohio agency sinks millions into rare coins
Mike Wilkinson and James Drew, The Blade; award-entry copy hosted by UCLA Anderson · 2005 reporting; hosted compilation undated
Where to look. PDF p.1, Arrangement scrutinized; internal-audit concerns and management responses
Cited in this study
Disciplinary Counsel v. Taft, 2006-Ohio-6525
Supreme Court of Ohio · 2006-12-27
Where to look. 112 Ohio St.3d 155; paragraphs 4–16: disclosures, criminal disposition, mitigation and public reprimand
Cited in this study
Ohio Securities Bulletin — Gasper criminal disposition
Ohio Department of Commerce, Division of Securities · 2007, Issue 1–2
Where to look. Printed p. 5, Criminal Reports; Gasper federal and state proceedings
Cited in this study
1 more locations
R.C. 4123.442 — development of investment policy
Ohio General Assembly / Ohio Laws · Effective 2025-03-20; accessed 2026-10-26
Where to look. Divisions A–D: benchmarks, prohibited investment vehicles and board authorization
Cited in this study
State ex rel. Dann v. Taft, 2006-Ohio-1825
Supreme Court of Ohio · 2006-04-13
Where to look. 109 Ohio St.3d 364; qualified gubernatorial-communications privilege, paragraphs 62–74
Cited in this study
State ex rel. Dann v. Taft, 2006-Ohio-3677
Supreme Court of Ohio · 2006-07-21
Where to look. 110 Ohio St.3d 252; paragraphs 11–13, 39–42; dissent paragraphs 43–56
Cited in this study
R.C. 4121.126 — conflicts of interest by board members or bureau employees
Ohio General Assembly / Ohio Laws · Effective 2007-09-10; accessed 2026-10-26
Where to look. Interests in investments, use of bureau funds, and specified former-insider business restrictions
Cited in this study
State v. Noe — State’s jurisdiction memorandum and cross-appeal
Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney; Supreme Court of Ohio docket · 2010
Where to look. Case 2010-0294; Statement of the Case and Facts, printed pp. 7–8
Cited in this study
In re Disqualification of Osowik, 2006-Ohio-7224
Supreme Court of Ohio, Chief Justice Thomas Moyer · 2006-03-08
Where to look. 117 Ohio St.3d 1237; No. 06-AP-019; paragraphs 1–9
Cited in this study
Noe v. Pineda — Report and Recommendation
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio; Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke · 2013-06-20
Where to look. Case 3:11-cv-01173, Document 19; printed pp. 18–22, grounds two and three
Cited in this study
Noe v. Pineda — Memorandum of Opinion and Order
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio; Judge John R. Adams · 2014-09-30
Where to look. Case 3:11-cv-01173, Document 31; pp. 1–4, especially p. 3 footnote 1 and p. 4 disposition
Cited in this study
State ex rel. Oriana House, Inc. v. Montgomery, 2006-Ohio-4854
Supreme Court of Ohio · 2006-10-04
Where to look. 110 Ohio St.3d 456; syllabus; paragraphs 25–26, 29, 35–36
Cited in this study
State ex rel. Repository v. Nova Behavioral Health, Inc., 2006-Ohio-6713
Supreme Court of Ohio · 2006-12-28
Where to look. 112 Ohio St.3d 338; paragraphs 32–43, especially 40–42
Cited in this study
R.C. 4123.44 — historical 2007 investment framework
Ohio General Assembly / Ohio Laws · Effective 2007-09-10; historical version accessed 2026-10-26
Where to look. Opening seven substantive paragraphs; House Bill 100, 127th General Assembly
Cited in this study
R.C. 109.981 — civil action for board-member fiduciary breach
Ohio General Assembly / Ohio Laws · Effective 2007-09-10; accessed 2026-10-26
Where to look. Entire substantive provision; House Bill 100, 127th General Assembly
Cited in this study
R.C. 4123.442 — historical investment-policy restrictions
Ohio General Assembly / Ohio Laws · Effective 2007-09-10
Where to look. House Bill 100; divisions (A)–(D), asset benchmarks, prohibited vehicles and board approval.
Cited in this study
R.C. 4121.129 — audit, actuarial and investment committees
Ohio General Assembly / Ohio Laws · Effective 2015-09-29; accessed 2026-10-28
Where to look. Divisions (A)(1)–(5) and (C)(2)(a)–(e): audit correction, implementation monitoring and investment oversight. Current text, not the original 2007 enactment.
Cited in this study
R.C. 4121.12 — board duties, investment review and education
Ohio General Assembly / Ohio Laws · Effective 2025-09-26; accessed 2026-10-28
Where to look. Divisions (F)(4), (6)–(12) and (15): independent audits and counsel, policy publication, due diligence, performance reporting and education.
Cited in this study
R.C. 4123.441 — chief investment officer qualifications and supervision
Ohio General Assembly / Ohio Laws · Effective 2007-09-10; accessed 2026-10-26
Where to look. Divisions (A)–(C): licensing and designation, reasonable supervision and conditional protection, annual control review and securities-transaction evaluation.
Cited in this study
R.C. 4121.127 — prohibited transactions, fiduciary responsibility and insurance
Ohio General Assembly / Ohio Laws · Effective 2005-09-29; accessed 2026-10-26
Where to look. Divisions (A)–(F): parties in interest and exception, personal conflicts, responsibility for another fiduciary’s breach, minimum bonding or insurance and fiduciary definition.
Cited in this study
57 records
Afinsa
Informe de la administración concursal de Afinsa
Afinsa court-appointed insolvency administrators; RDMF mirror · 2007-03-29
Where to look. Printed pp. 68–72 cash flows (tables in thousands of euros); pp. 137–146 contract analysis; pp. 147–153 CIT growth; p. 404 closing balance; printed p. 204 (PDF p. 206), Cliente Amigo referral campaign and participation/contract figures
Cited in this study
12 more locations
- The case in brief
- What customers bought: four contract models
- How the cash cycle worked
- Growth enlarged the obligations
- Money and affected contracts
- Why accounting and legal classification both mattered
- Chronology
- People, companies and jurisdictions
- Reading the documentary record
- Assessment
- Study overview
- Financial effects & models
STS 749/2017 — Afinsa criminal appeal
Tribunal Supremo, Sala de lo Penal · 2017-11-21
Where to look. ECLI:ES:TS:2017:4008; STS 749/2017; second judgment and disposition, PDF pp. 91–92; public copy uses substituted personal names
Supreme Court reduces Afinsa executives’ sentences
RTVE · 2017-11-23
Cited in this study
1 more locations
STS 611/2015 — Afinsa repurchase obligations
Tribunal Supremo, Sala de lo Civil; vLex mirror · 2015-11-19
Where to look. ECLI:ES:TS:2015:5069; appeal 589/2013; legal reasoning numbered paragraphs 8–12 on contractual commitments, maturity, contingent claims and transfer of the stamps into the estate; paragraphs 13–14 on market valuation. Full judgment also reproduced by Iustel, ref_iustel=1150804.
SEC v. Escala Group, Manning and Crawford — complaint
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · 2009-03-23
Where to look. Complaint §§20–25, pp10–13; footnote1 p13 says counsel informed audit committee in July2004
Greg Manning settlement
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · 2010-08-24
Where to look. Litigation Release 21630
Larry Crawford settlement
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · 2011-09-16
Where to look. Litigation Release 22095
Investor complaints report — second quarter 2006
Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores · 2006
Where to look. Closing discussion of Afinsa / Fórum; Additional passages reviewed 2026-10-28: Printed p. 17, section 6.1, Inversiones en bienes tangibles
Cited in this study
Ley 43/2007 — protection of consumers buying goods with a repurchase offer
Boletín Oficial del Estado · 2007-12-13
Where to look. Articles2–5,7–8; effective December15,2007; transition provision renewals after effectiveness; Additional passages reviewed 2026-10-28: Articles 4(4), 5, 7 and 8(4); transitional provision, paragraph 3
Cited in this study
STS 894/2026 — Afinsa VAT recovery dispute
Tribunal Supremo, Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo; vLex mirror · 2026-07-14
Where to look. Recurso 349/2024
Afinsa liquidation — official notices
Liquidación Afinsa · 2023–2026
Cited in this study
Order setting rules after insolvency conclusion
Juzgado Mercantil 6, Madrid; liquidators’ site · 2024-02-06
Cited in this study
Requests with payment entitlement — second quarter 2026
Liquidación Afinsa / judicial consignation notice · 2026
Escala quarterly report: ownership and supply agreements
Escala Group — SEC Form 10-Q · Quarter ended 2005-12-31
Where to look. Note1 pp8–9; MD&A pp30–31, supply agreement, pricing and fee
Corporate history and SEC settlement
Spectrum Group International — SEC Form 10-K · Fiscal year ended 2009-06-30
Where to look. Item3 p22; Note15 ppF34–F35, securities and derivative settlements Restatement, Purchase Accounting: Superior and other acquisitions, undocumented management estimates and subsequent independent appraisals.
Corporate name history
Spectrum Group International — SEC Form 10-K · Fiscal year ended 2011-06-30
Where to look. Item 1, p. 3
Cited in this study
1 more locations
Afinsa criminal trial judgment 22/2016
Audiencia Nacional, Sala de lo Penal, Sección Primera — FACUA-hosted copy · 2016-07-27
Where to look. Proven facts pp. 14–34; contract products pp. 22–25; transaction examples pp. 29–33; accounting and auditor pp. 94–105; verdict and civil relief pp. 170–174, as modified on appeal; p. 65, brochure promises and customer loss (English excerpt marked as translation)
Cited in this study
18 more locations
- The case in brief
- What customers bought: four contract models
- How the cash cycle worked
- Growth enlarged the obligations
- Marketing, credibility and the sales network
- Five different meanings of stamp value
- Three transactions that expose the valuation problem
- Greg Manning Auctions, Escala and corporate control
- What internal warnings established
- Why accounting and legal classification both mattered
- The auditor: professional failure and criminal acquittal
- Enforcement against the company and former executives
- Criminal responsibility and the appeal
- Compensation ordered is not compensation collected
- Chronology
- People, companies and jurisdictions
- Reading the documentary record
- Assessment
Escala announces settlement of SEC investigation
Escala Group — SEC-filed exhibit 99.1 · 2009-03-23
Where to look. Opening paragraphs; court approval subsequently reported in A19
Cited in this study
Crawford administrative order
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · 2011-09-21
Where to look. Section III.2, p. 2
Cited in this study
Afinsa criminal appeal and sentence enforcement — official prosecution report
Fiscalía General del Estado, Fiscalía Especial contra la Corrupción y la Criminalidad Organizada · 2019 annual report, addressing 2018 activity
Where to look. Entry: Sumario 2/2013, Caso AFINSA; STS 749/2017; ejecutoria 100/17
Cited in this study
Petition 0231/2019 — Commission response on compensation and EU financial-services coverage
European Parliament, Committee on Petitions / European Commission · 2022-03-16
Where to look. PE643.153v02–00, pp. 1–2; response and conclusion
Cited in this study
Afinsa insolvency conclusion and extinction — commercial-register entry
Boletín Oficial del Registro Mercantil · 2024-03-15; records order dated 2023-06-12
Where to look. Entry 132162; insolvency 208/2006; inscription 362 dated March 8, 2024
Cited in this study
2 more locations
Improved ICO advance program for affected philatelic customers
Government of Spain — Council of Ministers · 2008-01-11
Where to look. Section “Mejora de la línea de mediación para los afectados por los casos de Fórum Filatélico y Afinsa”
Cited in this study
2 more locations
Spectrum Group International restatement of Afinsa-related transactions
Spectrum Group International — SEC Form 8-K · 2009-06-30
Where to look. Note 3, pp. F-16–F-18; “Transactions with Afinsa” and “Revenue recognition”
Cited in this study
1 more locations
Ley 35/2003 — original rules for marketing certain tangible goods
Boletín Oficial del Estado · 2003-11-04; original version effective 2004-02-05
Where to look. Original additional provision four, especially paragraphs 1–2; later repealed by Ley 43/2007; Additional passages reviewed 2026-10-28: Historical additional provision four, paragraphs 1, 2 and 9
Cited in this study
2 more locations
State Legal Service report on 2010 philatelic-case liability litigation
Abogacía General del Estado — Ministry of Justice · 2011; report for 2010
Where to look. Printed p. 55, PDF p. 59, reporting Supreme Court decisions of December 9 and 13, 2010; government litigant perspective
Cited in this study
2008 ICO advance program — eligibility, repayment and operating terms
Agència Catalana del Consum — government program information · 2008; participating-institution list updated 2008-02-18
Where to look. pp. 1–2: limits, interest, commission and five-year amortization; p. 4: dated institution list
Cited in this study
2 more locations
Greg Manning Auctions — Spectrum merger proxy
Greg Manning Auctions, Inc. · 2000-01-13
Where to look. Printed p. 5: Spectrum founded in 1991 by Warren Trepp and his Drexel role; introduction and Annex B identify selling shareholders. Filing date January 13; proxy dated January 14.
Cited in this study
Greg Manning Auctions — completion of Spectrum merger
Greg Manning Auctions, Inc. · 2000-03-06
Where to look. Form 8-K, Item 2: agreement December 8, 1999; closing February 18, 2000; effective February 22; actual share distribution. This event-specific report distinguishes dates compressed in later corporate summaries.
In the Matter of Warren G. Trepp — initial decision
SEC Administrative Law Judge Carol Fox Foelak · 1997-08-18
Where to look. Release 115, File 3-8833. Sections II.A–B and III.B: settlement contribution, Reliance, recordkeeping and rejected theories; public-interest discussion and dismissal. Both sides appealed; final Commission disposition is A35.
Cited in this study
In the Matter of Warren G. Trepp — order dismissing proceedings
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · 1999-09-24
Where to look. Release 34-41913, File 3-8833: no remedial purpose in a cease-and-desist order; Commission takes no view on the merits or the ALJ’s legal standard.
Cited in this study
Managing the Crisis: The FDIC and RTC Experience — professional liability claims
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation · 1998
Where to look. Volume I, Chapter 11, printed pp. 282–283: Drexel/Milken settlements and claims on behalf of 53 failed thrifts. The passage does not name Trepp; his contribution is separately recorded in A34.
Cited in this study
Collectors Universe — fiscal 2004 Form 10-K
Collectors Universe, Inc. · 2004 (year ended June 30)
Where to look. Note 3, Discontinued Operations: February 19 sale to Spectrum of Bowers & Merena, Kingswood and Superior; combined consideration and retained inventory and receivables. Accounting classification is not a later closure date.
Cited in this study
Collectors Universe / Spectrum asset purchase agreement
Collectors Universe, Inc. and Spectrum Numismatics International, Inc.; SEC exhibit reproduced by Justia · 2004-02-19
Where to look. Article I, Auction Business Records; sections 2.1 and 2.8: trade names, records, licensed software and data transfer. Contract price $2.51 million differs from the seller’s annual-report amount; neither is a Superior-only price.
Cited in this study
Spectrum Group International — Afinsa ownership and wine operations
Spectrum Group International, Inc. · 2012-09-27
Where to look. Item 1: wine business formed February 2009; Afinsa/Auctentia majority through September 25, 2012; stake approximately 57% at June 30 and 9.9% after repurchase.
Cited in this study
United States v. Kurniawan — London-auction charging affidavit
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York / FBI · 2012-03-08
Where to look. Printed pp. 29–36, paragraphs 46–53: London nominee arrangement and withdrawals. The affidavit anonymizes the businesses; A41 identifies them. Allegations at charging stage.
Cited in this study
United States v. Kurniawan — Spectrum/Vanquish trial evidence
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York; transcript mirrored by Vinography · 2013-12-13
Where to look. Printed pp. 819–822: named auction businesses, disclosure answers and documentary stipulation; pp. 845–846: cross-examination and qualification of witness’s assertion of knowledge.
Cited in this study
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Milken — civil docket and parties
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York; PACER/RECAP docket reproduced by CourtListener · 1991-01-18 (case filed)
Where to look. Case 1:91-cv-00433. Defendant grouping includes Warren Trepp; plaintiffs are FDIC and Resolution Trust Corporation. Register establishes party status, not adjudication of the underlying allegations.
Cited in this study
Trepp often seems to be in the wrong place at the wrong time
J. Patrick Coolican, Steve Kanigher and Mary Manning / Las Vegas Sun · 2006-11-19
Where to look. eTreppid/Montgomery civil dispute and Trepp/Gibbons responses. For Spectrum merger timing use the original completion filing A33; for final SEC disposition use A35; for the later investigation outcome use A44.
Cited in this study
Nevada Governor Faces No Charges as Inquiry Ends
Carrie Johnson / The Washington Post · 2008-11-02
Where to look. Opening paragraph. Displayed publication date November 2; archive URL November 3. Attributed reporting, not an official prosecutorial disposition letter.
Cited in this study
Securities Purchase Agreement among Afinsa, Auctentia and Spectrum Group International
Afinsa Bienes Tangibles, Auctentia and Spectrum Group International; SEC EDGAR · 2012-03-05
Where to look. Recitals; sections 2.1–2.2; the original agreement, subsequently amended before closing
Cited in this study
SGI reports completion of the Afinsa securities purchase
Spectrum Group International; SEC EDGAR · 2012-09-26
Where to look. Items 2.01, 3.02, 5.01–5.02 and 8.01; September 25, 2012 closing
SGI announces the original Afinsa buyout agreement and board process
Spectrum Group International; SEC EDGAR · 2012-03-07
Where to look. Item 1.01, especially original price, special committee recommendation, abstentions and fairness opinion
Cited in this study
Roth Capital Partners fairness opinion on the proposed Afinsa buyout
Roth Capital Partners; SEC EDGAR exhibit 99.1 · 2012-03-05
Where to look. Opening mandate; review items (i)–(viii); paragraphs on verification, appraisal and scope; fee and prior services disclosures; final conclusion
Cited in this study
SGI quarterly report: Afinsa consignments and disposal of the stamp division
Spectrum Group International; SEC EDGAR · 2012-09-30
Where to look. Note 12, Related Party Transactions, ‘Other Transactions with Afinsa,’ printed p. 22; Note 3 and MD&A, Discontinued Operations, for September 13, 2012 disposal
Cited in this study
Afinsa insolvency closure judgment 83/2023
Juzgado de lo Mercantil nº 6 de Madrid; Iberley reproduction · 2023-06-12
Where to look. ECLI:ES:JMM:2023:4453; CENDOJ 28079470062023100070; grounds Segundo, paras. 1–5; Tercero, paras. 1–2; Quinto; disposition
INFORMA 147400 — Pérdida inversión en Afinsa
Agencia Estatal de Administración Tributaria · 2024; updated guidance includes 2025 ruling
Where to look. Pregunta, Respuesta and Normativa/doctrina; references V0652-24, V1103-25 and insolvency 208/2006
Cited in this study
Dirección General de Tributos — Memoria de actividades 2024
Ministerio de Hacienda, Dirección General de Tributos · 2024
Where to look. Printed p. 35 (PDF page 57), Consulta V0652-24, de 12 de abril, ‘Pérdidas de Afinsa’
Cited in this study
SGI reports first amendment to the Afinsa purchase agreement
Spectrum Group International; SEC EDGAR · 2012-07-05
Where to look. Item 1.01: July 4 amendment; termination-date extension and 5% interest from July 15.
Cited in this study
Third amendment to the Afinsa securities purchase agreement
Afinsa, Auctentia and Spectrum Group International; SEC EDGAR · 2012-09-17 (agreement’s stated as-of date)
Where to look. Clauses 1(b)–(c), 1(j), 1(l): retained-share calculation, revised section 2.2, resignations and sale assistance.
Cited in this study
2014 agreement for remaining shares and Washington collection
Afinsa, Auctentia, Spectrum Group International and A-Mark Precious Metals; SEC EDGAR · 2014-02-26
Where to look. Recitals; sections 2.1–2.2 and 3.1(g): assets, payment allocations and collection warranty exclusions.
Cited in this study
SGI reports the first 2014 Afinsa purchase closing
Spectrum Group International; SEC EDGAR · 2014-02-27
Where to look. Item 1.01, first-closing paragraphs: February 26 completion, $2.10 per share and transfer of distribution rights.
Cited in this study
A-Mark reports completed purchase of Afinsa and Auctentia shares
A-Mark Precious Metals; SEC EDGAR · 2014-06-06
Where to look. Item 1.01: June 4 amendment and closing; A-Mark holdings extinguished; SGI closing separately scheduled.
Cited in this study
Government submits tangible-goods consumer-protection bill
Government of Spain — Council of Ministers / La Moncloa · 2007-04-20
Where to look. Opening explanation of judicial interventions, May 25, 2006 parliamentary motion and bill submission. Read the enacted law A10 for final obligations.
Cited in this study
Supreme Court order refusing the Banco de España liability appeal
Tribunal Supremo, Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo; vLex reproduction · 2022-10-19
Where to look. ECLI:ES:TS:2022:14266A; appeal 8018/2021; Hechos Primero, Razonamientos Jurídicos Segundo–Tercero and operative disposition. Refusal of admission, not a new merits trial.
Cited in this study
Afinsa culpable insolvency and individual disqualifications — commercial-register entries
Boletín Oficial del Registro Mercantil · 2020-07-14
Where to look. Entries 221786, 221800, 221805 and 221806; inscription dated July 7, 2020. Records final September 30, 2014 culpability judgment and fifteen-year disqualifications; not proof of collections.
Cited in this study
SAP Madrid 358/2017 — reproduced first-instance insolvency culpability disposition
Audiencia Provincial de Madrid, Sección 28; vLex reproduction · 2017-07-13
Where to look. ECLI:ES:APM:2017:10887; appeal 259/2015; Antecedentes de Hecho Primero, quoted September 30, 2014 disposition, paragraphs 2–4. Cited only for that historical disposition; use A60 for registered final disqualifications.
Cited in this study
58 records
R. Allen Stanford / Stanford Financial
Allen Stanford sentenced to 110 years
U.S. Department of Justice · 2012-06-14
Where to look. S.D. Tex. 4:09-cr-342
Cited in this study
United States v. Stanford — criminal appeal
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · 2015-10-29
Where to look. 805 F.3d 557; appeal 12-20411; background pp. 2–4 and appellate disposition
Investigation of SEC response to concerns regarding Stanford
SEC Office of Inspector General · 2010-03-31
Where to look. Report 526; printed pp. 16–18, 29–60, 70–80 and 123–130; especially pp. 16–17 and 58–60. PDF page numbers are eight greater than printed page numbers.
SEC testimony on the Inspector General’s Stanford report
Robert Khuzami and Carlo di Florio, SEC · 2010-09-22
Where to look. Sections “Enforcement and OCIE Responses,” first and second recommendations
Cited in this study
Oversight hearing on the SEC Inspector General’s Stanford report
U.S. Senate; GovInfo · 2010-09-22
Where to look. S. Hrg. 111-818
Cited in this study
Leroy King sentenced
U.S. Department of Justice · 2021-02-24
Cited in this study
James Davis sentenced
U.S. Department of Justice · 2013-01-22
Cited in this study
Gilbert Lopez and Mark Kuhrt sentenced
U.S. Department of Justice · 2013-02-14
Laura Pendergest-Holt sentenced
U.S. Attorney, Southern District of Texas · 2012-09-13
SEC v. SIPC
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit; Justia mirror · 2014-07-18
Where to look. Appeal 12-5286
Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Troice
U.S. Supreme Court; Cornell LII mirror · 2014-02-26
Where to look. 571 U.S. 377; No. 12-79
Cited in this study
TD agrees to settle Stanford matter
TD Bank Group · 2023-02-27
Cited in this study
2 more locations
Final civil judgment and memorandum opinion
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas; Justia mirror · 2025-01-29
Where to look. 3:09-cv-00298-N; document 3455
Cited in this study
1 more locations
Receiver cash-flow statement, exhibit 1
Receiver Ralph Janvey; court examiner’s archive · 2025-08-20
Where to look. Document 3521-1, p. 2
Order approving final distribution
U.S. District Court; court examiner’s archive · 2025-10-08
Where to look. Document 3555; supplemental-fee discussion pp. 9–13
Cited in this study
1 more locations
Court-appointed examiner’s case and filing archive
John J. Little / Little Pedersen Fankhauser LLP · Updates through 2026
Cited in this study
1 more locations
Receiver status report on final distribution payments
Receiver Ralph Janvey · 2026-07-09
Where to look. Document 3629; reported status July 1, 2026
Cited in this study
Order denying Escalona requests
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · 2026-08-03
Where to look. Document 3637
SEC v. Stanford — oral argument recording index
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · 2026-10-07
Where to look. 25-11338; SEC v. Stanford
Cited in this study
2 more locations
Stanford International Bank v. HSBC — case record
UK Supreme Court · 2022-12-21
Where to look. [2022] UKSC 34; UKSC/2021/0103
Cited in this study
1 more locations
Stanford v. HSBC — press summary
UK Supreme Court · 2022-12-21
Cited in this study
1 more locations
Update to Creditors — June 2026
Joint liquidators of Stanford International Bank · 2026-06-23
Where to look. Sections 2–5 and Appendix A
In the Matter of Spencer C. Barasch — consent sanctions order
Securities and Exchange Commission · 2012-05-24
Where to look. Release 34-67060; File 3-14891; pp. 1–4, findings 3–10 and sections IV–V
Cited in this study
Spencer C. Barasch — order permitting resumed SEC practice
Securities and Exchange Commission · 2013-09-05
Where to look. Release 34-70332; File 3-14891; sections II–III
Cited in this study
SEC v. Stanford International Bank — Société Générale settlement bar order appeal
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · 2024-08-09
Where to look. No. 23-10726; majority pp. 2, 6–8, 17–18; concurrence in judgment pp. 19–21
Cited in this study
1 more locations
Receiver and professional firms’ opening brief on supplemental fees
Appellants in Fifth Circuit appeal; court examiner’s archive · 2026-03-23
Where to look. No. 25-11338; Document 55; printed pp. 17–18 and 23 (PDF pp. 31–32 and 37). Archive filename says 2023; filed header and examiner index show 2026.
SEC appellee brief opposing additional supplemental fees
Securities and Exchange Commission; court examiner’s archive · 2026-05-23
Where to look. No. 25-11338; Document 67; printed pp. 16–17 (PDF pp. 26–27)
Receiver’s counsel reports bank-settlement receipts
Baker Botts LLP · 2024-07-01
Where to look. Opening paragraph; settlement totals and concluding payment/distribution paragraph
Cited in this study
SEC v. Stanford International Bank — first amended complaint
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · 2009-02-27
Where to look. Document 48; paragraphs 21–28 (rates and commissions), 43–53 (portfolio and oversight), 61–80 (SAS allegations). Allegations, not findings.
Cited in this study
1 more locations
James Davis pleads guilty — false accounting and Tier III assets
U.S. Department of Justice · 2009-08-27
Where to look. Paragraphs describing general-ledger entries from 1990, reverse-engineered return figures, Tier III and the 2008 land transaction.
Cited in this study
1 more locations
Leroy King pleads guilty — obstruction of the SEC investigation
U.S. Attorney, Southern District of Texas · 2020-01-30
Where to look. King’s FSRC duties, approximately $520,963.87 in cash payments, benefits and refusal of the SEC assistance request.
Cited in this study
Stanford receivership — claim certifications and payee requirements
Stanford U.S. receivership claims administrator · Historical instructions; accessed 2026-10-26
Where to look. Certification Forms and Distribution, questions 2–7; Trusts, Deceased Accountholders, and Related Beneficiaries. The FAQ preserves historical procedures; it is not evidence that closed plans remain open.
Investor written testimony to the Senate Banking Committee
Investor testimony preserved by the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · 2009-08-14
Where to look. Investor written statement dated August 14, prepared for the August 17, 2009 hearing; pp. 1–2 describe retirement, advice, liquidity and protection. Personal name omitted; broader liability claims are the witness’s position.
Cited in this study
1 more locations
Switzerland compensates victims in the case of Allen Stanford
Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland; Swiss federal authorities · 2014-03-10
Where to look. Corporate aggravated-money-laundering sanction against Stanford Group (Suisse) AG; CHF 1m fine and CHF 6–9m compensatory claims. Distinct from the SIB/UBP civil claim.
Cited in this study
Stanford receivership — distribution schedules
Stanford U.S. receivership claims administrator · 2013–2026; accessed 2026-10-26
Where to look. Introduction identifies eleven closed interim plans and final plan; first listed interim schedule dated August 20, 2013.
SEC concludes certain Stanford investors qualify for SIPA protection
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · 2011-06-15
Where to look. SEC request for SIPC liquidation and proposed claims procedure. The contrary 2014 appellate outcome is S11.
Cited in this study
2009 special review of FINRA’s examination program — Stanford findings
FINRA Special Review Committee · 2009-09
Where to look. Printed pp. 18–28: 2005 cycle, CD economics, jurisdiction and SEC-referral misunderstanding; p. 28, footnote 26: $20,000 check-holding fine; pp. 38–44: 2007 cycle and Boca Raton examination. PDF page number is printed page + 3.; Additional passages reviewed 2026-10-28: Printed p. 1 (scope and interview limits); pp. 18–28 (Stanford examinations and referral); pp. 69–76 (responses and recommendations). Printed page 1 is PDF reader page 4.
Cited in this study
2 more locations
SEC testimony — closing the Stanford OIG recommendations
Robert Khuzami and Carlo di Florio, SEC · 2011-05-13
Where to look. Enforcement and OCIE Responses to Inspector General Recommendations; closure dates October 8, 2010 and March 9, 2011.; Additional passages reviewed 2026-10-28: Enforcement and OCIE Responses to Inspector General Recommendations; closure dates October 8, 2010 and March 9, 2011; second recommendation on performance measures.
Cited in this study
2 more locations
Janvey v. Brown — recovery of payments above principal
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit; Justia court-opinion mirror · 2014-09-11
Where to look. 767 F.3d 430; Nos. 13-10266, 13-10272, 13-10276, 13-10279; opinion pp. 3, 15–22, especially pp. 17–21 (interest/principal and IRA distinction)
Janvey v. Golf Channel — Texas Supreme Court answer on reasonably equivalent value
Supreme Court of Texas · 2016-04-01
Where to look. No. 15-0489; 487 S.W.3d 560; opinion pp. 4–7 (transaction and issue), pp. 33–35 (conclusion); introductory holding p. 4
Cited in this study
Janvey v. Golf Channel — judgment affirmed after certified answer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit; Justia court-opinion mirror · 2016-08-22
Where to look. No. 13-11305; 834 F.3d 570; opinion pp. 2–5, including Texas-law/federal-law distinction and final affirmance
Cited in this study
Janvey v. GMAG — inquiry notice and the good-faith defense
Supreme Court of Texas · 2019-12-20
Where to look. No. 19-0452; 592 S.W.3d 125; opinion pp. 1–5, especially p. 5 n. 1; pp. 7–14, good faith and rejection of futility exception
Janvey v. GMAG — application of Texas answer and judgment for receiver
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit; FindLaw court-opinion mirror · 2020-10-08
Where to look. No. 17-11526; 977 F.3d 422; § I (transactions, payments and jury findings); § III.A (record evidence), III.C (no retrial), IV (disposition)
Cited in this study
Janvey v. GMAG — setoff denied on equitable grounds
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-03-20
Where to look. Nos. 22-10235 and 22-10429; 98 F.4th 127; substituted opinion pp. 2–7 (history), pp. 24–27 (unclean hands, preference and affirmance)
Cited in this study
Janvey v. GMAG — second rehearing petition denied
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-08-26
Where to look. Nos. 22-10235 and 22-10429; order/opinion pp. 2–3 (denial and procedural scope), pp. 4–9 (judge/jury allocation)
Cited in this study
GMAG v. Janvey — certiorari docket 24-679
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-01-27
Where to look. Lower-court decision March 20, 2024; rehearing August 26, 2024; January 27, 2025 entry: petition denied
Cited in this study
Troice v. Proskauer Rose — attorney immunity
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit; Justia mirror · 2016-03-10
Where to look. No. 15-10500; 816 F.3d 341; pp. 2–3, 9–12; p. 11 n. 3.
Cited in this study
Proskauer settlement agreement
Settling parties; Stanford claims archive · 2018-08-24
Where to look. Document 2769 excerpt; agreement pp. 3–6; paragraphs 19–20, pp. 13–14.
Cited in this study
Zacarias v. Stanford — Willis and BMB bar orders
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit; Justia mirror · 2019-12-19
Where to look. No. 17-11073 and consolidated appeals; 945 F.3d 883; pp. 5, 16, 21, 24–29, 34–37.
Cited in this study
SEC v. Stanford — insurance settlement vacated
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · 2019-06-17
Where to look. No. 17-10663; 927 F.3d 830; pp. 3–8, 22–27, 31.
Cited in this study
SEC v. Stanford — amended insurance settlement approved
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas; Justia mirror · 2021-01-21
Where to look. Document 3052; pp. 4–7 and 16.
Cited in this study
BDO settlement agreement
Settling parties; Stanford claims archive · 2015-05
Where to look. Agreement pp. 3–4, paragraph 8 (p. 7), paragraph 21 (p. 11), paragraph 46 (p. 20); appended order forms.
Cited in this study
OCIE Regional Offices’ Referrals to Enforcement
SEC Office of Inspector General · 2011-03-30
Where to look. Report 493; transmittal p. ii; executive summary pp. iv–vii; recommendations 2–7.; Additional passages reviewed 2026-10-28: Report 493; printed pp. 14–19 (documentation and capture), 24–25 (status reconciliation), 29 (judgmental sampling), recommendations 2–7. Printed page 14 is PDF reader page 23; printed page 29 is PDF reader page 38.
Re Stanford International Bank — cross-border recognition
Court of Appeal of England and Wales · 2010-02-25
Where to look. [2010] EWCA Civ 137, paragraphs 23–29, 48–56, 67 and 102(2).
Cited in this study
United States v. Robert Allen Stanford — international settlement account
U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division · 2013 settlement account; page updated 2023-09-27
Where to look. Settlement Agreement Reached: asset pool, anticipated distributions, coordination and April 2013 approvals.
Cited in this study
Responses concerning the March 12, 2013 Settlement Agreement
Joint Liquidators of Stanford International Bank · 2013 agreement Q&A; page does not establish original posting date
Where to look. Questions 3–4, 7 and 9: working capital, prior advance, separate distributions and litigation coordination.
Cited in this study
Re Stanford International Bank — Antiguan clawback and distribution adjustment
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council · 2019-12-16
Where to look. [2019] UKPC 45, paragraphs 54–74, 79, 104–109 and 113–114.
Cited in this study
26 records
Spectrum Wine
Spectrum Group International — fiscal 2012 Form 10-K
Spectrum Group International, Inc. · 2012-09-27
Where to look. Item 1: prior names; Afinsa/Auctentia majority ownership through September 25, 2012; June 30 stake and subsequent repurchase.
Cited in this study
United States v. Rudy Kurniawan — criminal complaint and FBI affidavit
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York / FBI · 2012-03-08
Where to look. Printed pp. 29–36, paragraphs 46–53: London nominee, physical handoff, provenance requests, 78 DRC bottles, additional de Vogüé lots, warning statements and withdrawal. Allegations at charging stage.
Spectrum and Vanquish: Kurniawan wines are not in sale
Adam Lechmere / Decanter · 2012-02-07
Where to look. Denial and proposed inspection process. Original date established by Decanter February 2012 archive; article displays a later May 27, 2015 update.
Cited in this study
Spectrum and Vanquish withdraw DRC lots from auction
Adam Lechmere / Decanter · 2012-02-08
Where to look. Thirteen initial withdrawals, distinguishing twelve DRC lots from Latour à Pomerol; label concerns and agent authentication limitation. Original date in February 2012 archive.
Cited in this study
Spectrum & Vanquish happy despite withdrawn lots at London auction
Adam Lechmere and Maggie Rosen / Decanter · 2012-02-10
Where to look. Sale proceeded, company responses and report of withdrawal addenda. Original date in February 2012 archive.
Cited in this study
Now Spectrum threatens to sue Kurniawan
Richard Woodard / Decanter · 2012-03-15
Where to look. Greg Roberts statement: alleged secret nominee, cooperation, halted consignments and conditional remedies. Original March 15 date in publisher archive; displayed May 2015 date is an update.
Cited in this study
1 more locations
United States v. Kurniawan — December 13, 2013 trial transcript
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York; transcript mirrored by Vinography · 2013-12-13
Where to look. Printed pp. 813–823 (relationship, Spectrum/Vanquish, disclosure answers and mailing stipulation) and 845–846 (cross-examination assertion of company knowledge, qualified as opinion and assumption). PDF page index = printed page minus 737.
Rudy Kurniawan sentenced to ten years for counterfeit wine and loan fraud
U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York · 2014-08-07
Where to look. Sentence, 2004–2012 conduct, separate $3 million loan, $20 million forfeiture and $28,405,502.50 restitution.
United States v. Kurniawan, 627 F. App’x 24 — summary order
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; judgment reproduced by CaseMine · 2015-12-22
Where to look. No. 14-2928-cr; affirmance; independent probable cause after excising protective-sweep observations; mail-fraud count and remaining arguments. Nonprecedential summary order.
Cited in this study
2 more locations
Spectrum Group International — fiscal 2009 Form 10-K
Spectrum Group International, Inc. · 2009-10-08
Where to look. Collectibles segment, pp. 5–6; authentication and return practices, p. 34 and note F-13.
Cited in this study
2 more locations
ICE confirms removal of Rudy Kurniawan to Indonesia
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement · 2021-04-14
Where to look. DHS/ICE bulletin dated April 14, 2021 confirms removal and arrival in Indonesia; original ICE page currently blocks automated retrieval.
Spectrum Wine Auctions 2012 Year in Review
Spectrum Wine Auctions · 2013-01-10
Where to look. Company-reported aggregate 2012 auction sales exceeding $14.5 million; distinct live and internet totals. Not an independent authenticity audit.
Cited in this study
United States v. Kurniawan — trial transcript, December 10, 2013
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York; transcript hosted by Vinography · 2013-12-10
Where to look. Printed pp. 34–37 (underwriting and provenance), pp. 73–76 (default, collateral sale and effect of undisclosed debt), pp. 102–106 (cross-examination on collateral and volatility), pp. 199–201 and 249–251 (Hardy direct and cross concerning the April 2008 withdrawals). PDF page index = printed page minus 30.
Vintage Fraud: Wine Dealer Sentenced in Counterfeiting Scheme
Federal Bureau of Investigation · 2014-09-05
Where to look. Agents’ description of the 2012 search, materials recovered, and cooperation by wine producers.
Wine — Treasures on Trial: The Art and Science of Detecting Fakes
Winterthur Museum, Garden & Library · 2017–2018 exhibition
Where to look. Faking the Labels: the purported 1990 La Tâche magnum and its label micrograph; distinct from the preceding Rodenstock discussion.
Cited in this study
Wine Dealer Rudy Kurniawan Convicted in Manhattan Federal Court
U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York · 2013-12-18
Where to look. The Scheme to Defraud a Lender; concluding identification of mail-fraud and wire-fraud counts.
Cited in this study
United States Marshals Service Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2016
U.S. Marshals Service · Fiscal year 2016
Where to look. Printed p. 24 (PDF p. 30), Counterfeit Wine: authentication, rounded bottle counts, auction proceeds, destruction and compensation assertion.
Cited in this study
1 more locations
Buyer’s action against Kurniawan — arbitration motion
California Court of Appeal; FindLaw mirror · 2011-02-24
Where to look. No. B222464; auction conditions, later website terms and disposition.
Cited in this study
Buyer’s consumer claims against Acker, Merrall & Condit Co.
New York Court of Appeals · 2012-03-27
Where to look. 18 N.Y.3d 940; statutory consumer claims and catalogue disclaimers.
Cited in this study
Wine buyer’s nonparty-discovery proceeding
New York Court of Appeals · 2014-04-03
Where to look. 23 N.Y.3d 32; nonparty discovery standard, notice and footnote 1.
Cited in this study
Former wine collector to forfeit $20 million for counterfeiting
Reuters — Nate Raymond and Joseph Ax · 2014-07-24
Where to look. Civil settlement disclosed by counsel and the buyer’s representative.
Cited in this study
Connected Grand Cru Wines
Laurent Ponsot SAS · Undated; accessed 2026-10-26
Where to look. Single-page description of NFC capsule, opening detection and removal-evident seals.
Cited in this study
United States v. Kurniawan — trial transcript, December 16, 2013
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York; transcript hosted by Vinography · 2013-12-16
Where to look. Printed pp. 1050–1054: Egan on the London inspection and Exhibits 3-1 and 1-1; pp. 1125–1128: redirect, initial answer and refreshed recollection of the importer-label error. PDF page index = printed page minus 923.; Printed pp. 1075–1076: cross-examination on two hours for 120 bottles, the availability of advance inspection appointments, and warehouse preparation.
Cited in this study
United States v. Kurniawan — trial transcript and jury instructions, December 17, 2013
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York; transcript hosted by Vinography · 2013-12-17
Where to look. Printed p. 1328: good faith, fraudulent intent and the burden of proof; pp. 1334–1335: differing uses of indebtedness evidence, advances argument, motive and prohibited propensity inference. PDF page index = printed page minus 1138.
Cited in this study
The Spectrum Wine Method
Spectrum Wine Auctions LLC · Undated; accessed 2026-10-28
Where to look. Inspection & Cataloguing; Condition Reporting; Inventory & Storage Tracking; Condition Notes. Current website account, not a dated record of the February 2012 London auction's procedures.
Cited in this study
Spectrum Wine — Terms & Conditions of Auction Sale
Spectrum Wine Auctions LLC · Undated; accessed 2026-10-28
Where to look. Auction tab: §3 Descriptions; §5 The Bidding Process, material-description-error return provision; §9 Disclaimer and Warranties. Read as an October 2026 website snapshot; not proof of 2012 London terms or a legal determination of enforceability.
Cited in this study